Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Court cases’ Category

Mclaren who???

Posted in Court cases, F1, FIA, Fernando Alonso, Ferrari, Lewis Hamilton, Maranello, Mclaren, Prancing Horse, Silver Arrow, Stolen Information, g force on October 22, 2007 | 2 Comments »

Remember when Alsonso had won his first world championship, the back of the t-shirt of a Renault mechanic read ” Schumacher who???”. Well, well, well… how tides turn and time flies by…
We won. No, we won emphatically… Sorry, we annihilated Mclaren to the point that they were more humiliated than saddened by their defeat yesterday. [...]

Read Full Post »

Wheels locked and nowhere to go…

Posted in Court cases, F1, FIA, Fernando Alonso, Ferrari, Lewis Hamilton, Maranello, Mclaren, Prancing Horse, Ron Dennis, Silver Arrow, Stolen Information, high profile cases on September 15, 2007 | Leave a Comment »

That verdict gotta hurt!!! and I’m not talking in monetary terms. Mclaren stripped of all constructors points!!!! whoa!!! news of the year i guess. But then the evidence that warranted such a verdict must have been damning indeed. This means that Ferrari are the unquestioned constructors champions this year. Yeah i guess its safe to [...]

Read Full Post »

Of Gods, bridges and affidavits…

Posted in ASI, Court cases, India, NDA, Ramsethu, UPA, politics on September 15, 2007 | 2 Comments »

I think Lord Shri Ram must be very tired and frustrated by now. In Hindu religion, he has the honour of being the “Purushottam” or the Best of all men. His life was a message of how to live life ideally and with purpose. but those very teachings are lost now and what remains is [...]

Read Full Post »

McLaren escape the rap as Ferrari fume…

Posted in Court cases, F1, FIA, Ferrari, Mclaren, Stolen Information on July 27, 2007 | Leave a Comment »

Well, the latest in the nail biting season of high speed thrills and espionage and betrayal is the aquittal of the Mclaren Mercedes team of charges of using stolen Ferrari designs. According to the WMSC, Mclaren have broken a rule by being in possession of confidential information of a competitior, but as there is insufficient [...]

Read Full Post »